Great
discussion this week. Great to have Thomas explain 'safety briefing' from
a real Marine's viewpoint, and Wahutu tell us how it feels to watch a movie
about how White People come in, plunder a country, then get spiritually saved
by the people they plunder. Yikes!
Lots of us had stuff to say about
how Avatar WORKS in culture -- what
feelings it produces, what positions those feelings argue you into, and how it
does all that. (Or, in technical terms, the rhetoric and politics of Avatar's visual and aural representations.) Unfortunately, given the
realities of a 200-person class, we didn't get to hear from everyone who wanted
to talk. And even the people who did
talk probably wanted to say more! So, here's an opportunity to take the
discussion further. In this week's post, we'd like you to:
1) Choose one SCENE or MOMENT in Avatar that we HAVEN'T (yet) discussed
in class.
2) Analyze the RHETORIC and POLITICS of its visual and aural representations. What did it (try to) make you feel? How did it (try to) do that? In doing this analysis, you'll want to read the SIGNIFIERS (the 'things' in the film) as closely as you can, and then move to the SIGNIFIEDS (what they 'mean'), and finally to their EFFECTS (what they 'do' to the viewer). Be as specific and detailed as you can.
3) Based on evidence from your analysis, make an ARGUMENT about the 'message' the scene or moment conveys. Make you can DEFEND every point you make with specific, detailed evidence from your analysis. Our ideas about how 'fantasy' works, publically and privately, to fill the gaps between images and us may help. Also the politics of 'myth,' hiding our historical / material realities. Also 'post Avatar depression.' And lots more.
* 300 words or more -- you'll need some space for this.
* No keywords required -- but you're welcome to use them if they'll help you make your points. (And whether or not you end up using words like 'intertextuality,' 'archetype,' 'psychodynamics,' and 'structures of feeling' in your post, you'll want to be thinking in those terms anyway. )
* No text-references required -- but again, you're welcome to use them if they'll help you make your points. (Anyone care to continue the debate on the 'White Messiah' archetype?)
Have fun!
2) Analyze the RHETORIC and POLITICS of its visual and aural representations. What did it (try to) make you feel? How did it (try to) do that? In doing this analysis, you'll want to read the SIGNIFIERS (the 'things' in the film) as closely as you can, and then move to the SIGNIFIEDS (what they 'mean'), and finally to their EFFECTS (what they 'do' to the viewer). Be as specific and detailed as you can.
3) Based on evidence from your analysis, make an ARGUMENT about the 'message' the scene or moment conveys. Make you can DEFEND every point you make with specific, detailed evidence from your analysis. Our ideas about how 'fantasy' works, publically and privately, to fill the gaps between images and us may help. Also the politics of 'myth,' hiding our historical / material realities. Also 'post Avatar depression.' And lots more.
* 300 words or more -- you'll need some space for this.
* No keywords required -- but you're welcome to use them if they'll help you make your points. (And whether or not you end up using words like 'intertextuality,' 'archetype,' 'psychodynamics,' and 'structures of feeling' in your post, you'll want to be thinking in those terms anyway. )
* No text-references required -- but again, you're welcome to use them if they'll help you make your points. (Anyone care to continue the debate on the 'White Messiah' archetype?)
Have fun!
No comments:
Post a Comment